help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published January 16, 2008. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.114215
© 2008 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on April 15, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.114215v1
94/8/2965    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ronald G Larson
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, S. L
Right arrow Articles by Larson, R. G
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, S. L
Right arrow Articles by Larson, R. G

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

Comparing Experimental and Simulated Pressure-Area Isotherms for DPPC

Susan L Duncan 1 and Ronald G Larson 1*

1 University of Michigan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rlarson{at}umich.edu.

Submitted on June 5, 2007
Revised on July 26, 2007
Accepted on 3 December 2007


   Abstract
Although pressure-area isotherms are commonly measured for lipid monolayers, it is not always appreciated how much they can vary depending on experimental factors. Here, we compare experimental and simulated pressure-area isotherms for DPPC (dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine) at temperatures ranging between 293.15K and 323.15K, and explore and possible factors influencing the shape and position of the isotherms. Molecular dynamics simulations of DPPC monolayers using both a coarse grained (CG) and an atomistic model yield results that are in rough agreement with some of the experimental isotherms, but with a steeper slope in the liquid-condensed (LC) region than seen experimentally and shifted to larger areas. The CG lipid model of Marrink et al. gives predictions that are very close to those of atomistic simulations, while greatly improving computational efficiency. There is much more variation among experimental isotherms than between isotherms obtained from CG simulations and from the most refined simulation available. Both atomistic and CG simulations yield LC and liquid-expanded (LE) phase area compressibility moduli that are significantly larger than those typically measured experimentally, but compare well with some experimental values obtained under rapid compression.

Key Words: coarse grained, dipalmitoyl lecithin, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine, liquid-condensed, liquid-expanded, phase transition







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.