help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published January 11, 2008. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.122366
© 2008 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on April 15, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.122366v1
94/8/3137    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Z.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, S.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Z.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, S.-J.

NUCLEIC ACIDS

Electrostatic free energy landscapes for DNA helix bending

Zhi-Jie Tan 1 and Shi-Jie Chen 2*

1 University of Missouri-Columbia
2 University Of Missouri-Columbia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chenshi{at}missouri.edu.

Submitted on September 19, 2007
Revised on October 23, 2007
Accepted on 30 November 2007


   Abstract
Nucleic acids are highly charged polyanionic molecules, thus, the ionic conditions are crucial for the nucleic acid structural changes such as bending. We use the tightly bound ion (TBI) theory, which explicitly accounts for the correlation and ensemble effects for counterions, to calculate the electrostatic free energy landscapes for DNA helix bending. The electrostatic free energy landscapes show that DNA bending energy is strongly dependent on ion concentration, valency and size. In a Na+ solution, DNA bending is electrostatically unfavorable because of the strong charge repulsion on backbone. With the increase of the Na+ concentration, the electrostatic bending repulsion is reduced and thus the bending becomes less unfavorable. In contrast, in a Mg2+ solution, ion correlation induces a possible attractive force between the different parts of the helical strands, resulting in bending. The electrostatically most favorable and unfavorable bending directions are toward the major and minor grooves respectively. Decreasing the size of the divalent ions enhances the electrostatic bending attraction, causing an increased bending angle, and shifts the most favorable bending to the direction towards the minor groove. The microscopic analysis on ion-binding distribution reveals that the divalent ion-induced helix bending attraction may come from the correlated distribution of the ions across the grooves in the bending direction.

Key Words: DNA, RNA folding, ion electrostatics







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.